Turtle Island Restoration Network

Forest Knolls, CA · EIN 911818080 · Natural Resources Conservation and Protection · IRS code C30

Can receive a giftListed without being asked

Their finances

from their own IRS Form 990, fiscal year 2025
Total revenue
$2M
$1,681,445
From donations
97%
$2M of revenue
Highest reported salary
$134K
TODD STEINER
Spending breakdown — and why we do not lead with it
Spent on programmes
76%
$1M of $2M spent

A high figure here is not straightforwardly good. The measure counts money spent on programmes against money spent running the organisation, so it rewards charities that under-invest in staff, systems and evaluation — and it can be moved by accounting choices rather than by doing more. The largest charity raters publicly abandoned it as a headline measure for exactly that reason. It is here because it is on the filing and people look for it, not because we think it tells you who to give to.

Employees
15
Volunteers
3,981
Total spending
$2M
Staff costs
$924K

No comparison shown. We list only 1 charity under this cause with a filing, which is too few to rank against meaningfully. A percentile drawn from a handful of organisations looks precise and means nothing.

Figures are as the organisation reported them to the IRS. We do not adjust, score or rate them, and we do not combine them into a single number — that would require deciding how much each one matters, which is your judgement to make, not ours.

Is this your organisation? If anything here is wrong, out of date, or you would rather not be listed at all, tell us and we will correct it or remove you. We do not require a reason.

Against every Natural Resources Conservation and Protection charity in the country

1,384 filed under IRS code C30 in 2025
From donations
97%
higher than 70% of them
median 88%
Spent on programmes
76%
higher than 34% of them
median 84%
Highest salary
$134K
higher than 86% of them
median $19K

A percentile here is a position among charities the IRS classifies the same way — it is not a score, and being lower is not automatically worse. A large organisation running its own veterinary hospitals will spend a different share on programmes than one that passes grants through, and both are doing their job.